In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
Resource Information
The work In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits represents a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School. This resource is a combination of several types including: Work, Language Material, Books.
The Resource
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
Resource Information
The work In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits represents a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School. This resource is a combination of several types including: Work, Language Material, Books.
- Label
- In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
- Title remainder
- on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
- Statement of responsibility
- Eric Rassbach, Lori Halstead Windham, Adèle Auxier Keim
- Title variation
- In the Supreme Court of the United States: Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents; on writs of certiorari
- Contributor
-
- United States, Supreme Court
- Hollingsworth, Dennis, 1967-
- Hollingsworth, Dennis, 1967-
- Keim, Adèle Auxier
- United States, Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
- United States, Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
- United States, Congress | House | Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group
- Perry, Kristin
- Perry, Kristin
- United States
- United States
- Windham, Lori Halstead
- Becket Fund for Religious Liberty
- Becket Fund for Religious Liberty
- Windsor, Edie
- Windsor, Edie
- United States, Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
- United States, Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
- United States, Supreme Court
- Language
- eng
- Summary
- The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine governmental authority, under equal protection and with respect to religious liberty, to promulgate laws prohibiting same sex marriage such as DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) and California's Proposition 8
- Cataloging source
- NjRocCCS
- Index
- no index present
- LC call number
- KF229.H65
- LC item number
- R37 2013
- Literary form
- non fiction
- Nature of contents
-
- dictionaries
- bibliography
- legal cases and notes
- http://bibfra.me/vocab/relation/petitioner
-
- MGznV66btt4
- 2Xm8vKIxftc
- Series statement
-
- HeinOnline subject compilation of state laws
- HeinOnline religion and the law
- Target audience
- specialized
Context
Context of In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the meritsEmbed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/sP63UNjm6XU/" typeof="CreativeWork http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Work"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/sP63UNjm6XU/">In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Work In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/sP63UNjm6XU/" typeof="CreativeWork http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Work"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/sP63UNjm6XU/">In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>