In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits

The Resource In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
Label
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
Title remainder
on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits
Statement of responsibility
Eric Rassbach, Lori Halstead Windham, Adèle Auxier Keim
Title variation
In the Supreme Court of the United States: Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents; on writs of certiorari
Creator
Contributor
Author
Respondent
Subject
Genre
Language
eng
Summary
The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine governmental authority, under equal protection and with respect to religious liberty, to promulgate laws prohibiting same sex marriage such as DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) and California's Proposition 8
Member of
Cataloging source
NjRocCCS
Index
no index present
LC call number
KF229.H65
LC item number
R37 2013
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • bibliography
  • legal cases and notes
http://bibfra.me/vocab/relation/petitioner
  • MGznV66btt4
  • 2Xm8vKIxftc
Series statement
  • HeinOnline subject compilation of state laws
  • HeinOnline religion and the law
Target audience
specialized

Context

Context of In the Supreme Court of the United States, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., petitioners, v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., respondents; United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits : brief amicus curiae of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support of Hollingsworth and the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group addressing the merits

Work of

Structured data from the Bibframe namespace is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License by Biddle Law Library- University of Pennsylvania Law School. Additional terms may apply to data associated with third party namespaces.
Processing Feedback ...