The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure
Resource Information
The work The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure represents a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library- University of Pennsylvania Law School. This resource is a combination of several types including: Work, Language Material, Books.
The Resource
The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure
Resource Information
The work The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure represents a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library- University of Pennsylvania Law School. This resource is a combination of several types including: Work, Language Material, Books.
- Label
- The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure
- Title remainder
- as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure
- Statement of responsibility
- by Patrick H. Loughran
- Language
- eng
- Index
- no index present
- Literary form
- non fiction
Context
Context of The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative ProcedureEmbed (Experimental)
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/OBqc_Nef3iU/" typeof="CreativeWork http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Work"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/OBqc_Nef3iU/">The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library- University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Work The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/OBqc_Nef3iU/" typeof="CreativeWork http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Work"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/resource/OBqc_Nef3iU/">The Morgan case in the Supreme Court : as misinterpreted in the practice and opinions of the Department of Agriculture relating to rate-making proceedings under the Packers and Stockyards Act. (In addenda) The government administrator and his legal adviser: dominance of the former over the latter, with special reference to the administration of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Observations on certain of the contents of Monograph no. 11, of the staff of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library- University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
