The Resource The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder
The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder
Resource Information
The item The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
Resource Information
The item The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.
This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
- Summary
- "[This book] is a story of due process from the common-law tradition. Told through Supreme Court cases against a backdrop of political theory, legal philosophy and history, it illuminates a mid-twentieth-century dialectic between theories{u2014}liberal and conservative{u2014}for resolving controversies about state interference with personal liberties. So pervasive was the partisanship flowing from a riven body politic that every institution comprising the fabric of American society, including the federal courts, was soaked in it. But the ideological contest is not the story{u2019}s primary concern. More pertinent to our dilemma today is what the clash of ideologies eclipsed: a venerable judicial practice deeply rooted in American history and tradition. The moral of the story is in this praxis at its center and its understanding of the limits of legislative and judicial power. The modern liberal and conservative approaches to fundamental rights fall short of the tradition, having strayed from the common-law concept of ordered liberty. Readers will find a suprapartisan perspective on the federal courts{u2019} obligation to resolve disputes about our Nation{u2019}s most controversial issues, and a critical reflection on the modern Supreme Court{u2019}s role in its politics"--Back cover
- Language
- eng
- Extent
- xv, 267 pages
- Contents
-
- A Bulwark against Arbitrary Legislation
- Liberty and Economic Ideology
- Philosophy, Incorporation, and Natural Law
- A Reasonable and Sensitive Judgment
- A Zone of Substantive Rights
- Procedural and Substantive Due Process
- Deeply Rooted in History and Tradition
- A Different Description of Fundamental Liberties
- The Inquiry Thus Reduces
- The Dimension of Personal Liberty
- The Guideposts of History, Tradition, and Practice
- The Tradition Is a Living Thing
- Certain Actions Are Prohibited
- A Prudential Exercise of the Judicial Power
- What Freedom Must Become
- Isbn
- 9781793626349
- Label
- The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015)
- Title
- The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition
- Title remainder
- slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015)
- Statement of responsibility
- Matthew W. Lunder
- Language
- eng
- Summary
- "[This book] is a story of due process from the common-law tradition. Told through Supreme Court cases against a backdrop of political theory, legal philosophy and history, it illuminates a mid-twentieth-century dialectic between theories{u2014}liberal and conservative{u2014}for resolving controversies about state interference with personal liberties. So pervasive was the partisanship flowing from a riven body politic that every institution comprising the fabric of American society, including the federal courts, was soaked in it. But the ideological contest is not the story{u2019}s primary concern. More pertinent to our dilemma today is what the clash of ideologies eclipsed: a venerable judicial practice deeply rooted in American history and tradition. The moral of the story is in this praxis at its center and its understanding of the limits of legislative and judicial power. The modern liberal and conservative approaches to fundamental rights fall short of the tradition, having strayed from the common-law concept of ordered liberty. Readers will find a suprapartisan perspective on the federal courts{u2019} obligation to resolve disputes about our Nation{u2019}s most controversial issues, and a critical reflection on the modern Supreme Court{u2019}s role in its politics"--Back cover
- Cataloging source
- UKMGB
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
- Lunder, Matthew W
- Index
- index present
- Literary form
- non fiction
- Nature of contents
- bibliography
- http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
-
- United States
- United States
- Due process of law
- Common law
- Liberty
- Common law
- Due process of law
- Liberty
- United States
- Label
- The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references and index
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Contents
- A Bulwark against Arbitrary Legislation -- Liberty and Economic Ideology -- Philosophy, Incorporation, and Natural Law -- A Reasonable and Sensitive Judgment -- A Zone of Substantive Rights -- Procedural and Substantive Due Process -- Deeply Rooted in History and Tradition -- A Different Description of Fundamental Liberties -- The Inquiry Thus Reduces -- The Dimension of Personal Liberty -- The Guideposts of History, Tradition, and Practice -- The Tradition Is a Living Thing -- Certain Actions Are Prohibited -- A Prudential Exercise of the Judicial Power -- What Freedom Must Become
- Dimensions
- 24 cm
- Extent
- xv, 267 pages
- Isbn
- 9781793626349
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- Note
- GOBI Library Solutions from EBSCO
- System control number
- (OCoLC)1230952098
- Label
- The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references and index
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Contents
- A Bulwark against Arbitrary Legislation -- Liberty and Economic Ideology -- Philosophy, Incorporation, and Natural Law -- A Reasonable and Sensitive Judgment -- A Zone of Substantive Rights -- Procedural and Substantive Due Process -- Deeply Rooted in History and Tradition -- A Different Description of Fundamental Liberties -- The Inquiry Thus Reduces -- The Dimension of Personal Liberty -- The Guideposts of History, Tradition, and Practice -- The Tradition Is a Living Thing -- Certain Actions Are Prohibited -- A Prudential Exercise of the Judicial Power -- What Freedom Must Become
- Dimensions
- 24 cm
- Extent
- xv, 267 pages
- Isbn
- 9781793626349
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- Note
- GOBI Library Solutions from EBSCO
- System control number
- (OCoLC)1230952098
Library Links
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/The-concept-of-ordered-liberty-and-the-common-law/uOVXFPL3Tso/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/The-concept-of-ordered-liberty-and-the-common-law/uOVXFPL3Tso/">The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Item The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/The-concept-of-ordered-liberty-and-the-common-law/uOVXFPL3Tso/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/The-concept-of-ordered-liberty-and-the-common-law/uOVXFPL3Tso/">The concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : slaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015), Matthew W. Lunder</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>