The Resource Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman
Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman
Resource Information
The item Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
Resource Information
The item Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.
This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
- Summary
- A State should today have an explicitly recognized and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defense, not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not incontestably compatible with the modern right of self-defence in Article 51 of the UN Charter. Then again, unilateral defense need not forever be confined to self-defence only, wherefore the book proposes that the concept of defense may best be modernized by a clear legal division into responsive and interceptive defense. Since both threat and use of force are explicitly prohibited in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, the book further recommends that both responsive and interceptive defense should be explicitly excepted from this prohibition in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The modern jus ad bellum should thus legally recognize a dual face of defense: responsive self-defense if an armed attack occurs, and interceptive necessity-defense if a grave and urgent threat of an armed attack occurs. Because without a clarifying and modernizing revision, the concept of defense will become irreparably blurred until ultimately completely dissolved into the ever shifting sands of war
- Language
- eng
- Extent
- xv, 241 pages
- Isbn
- 9781509906970
- Label
- Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence
- Title
- Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum
- Title remainder
- the dual face of defence
- Statement of responsibility
- Johanna Friman
- Language
- eng
- Summary
- A State should today have an explicitly recognized and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defense, not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not incontestably compatible with the modern right of self-defence in Article 51 of the UN Charter. Then again, unilateral defense need not forever be confined to self-defence only, wherefore the book proposes that the concept of defense may best be modernized by a clear legal division into responsive and interceptive defense. Since both threat and use of force are explicitly prohibited in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, the book further recommends that both responsive and interceptive defense should be explicitly excepted from this prohibition in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The modern jus ad bellum should thus legally recognize a dual face of defense: responsive self-defense if an armed attack occurs, and interceptive necessity-defense if a grave and urgent threat of an armed attack occurs. Because without a clarifying and modernizing revision, the concept of defense will become irreparably blurred until ultimately completely dissolved into the ever shifting sands of war
- Cataloging source
- DLC
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
- Friman, Johanna
- Index
- index present
- Literary form
- non fiction
- Nature of contents
- bibliography
- Series statement
- Studies in international law
- Series volume
- volume 66
- http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
-
- Just war doctrine
- War (International law)
- Self-defense (Law)
- Just war doctrine
- Self-defense (Law)
- War (International law)
- Label
- Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 229-233) and index
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Dimensions
- 24 cm.
- Extent
- xv, 241 pages
- Isbn
- 9781509906970
- Isbn Type
- (hardback)
- Lccn
- 2016046246
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- Note
- GOBI Library Solutions from EBSCO
- System control number
- (OCoLC)960166751
- Label
- Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 229-233) and index
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Dimensions
- 24 cm.
- Extent
- xv, 241 pages
- Isbn
- 9781509906970
- Isbn Type
- (hardback)
- Lccn
- 2016046246
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- Note
- GOBI Library Solutions from EBSCO
- System control number
- (OCoLC)960166751
Library Links
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Revisiting-the-concept-of-defence-in-the-jus-ad/DMjxechlfqQ/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Revisiting-the-concept-of-defence-in-the-jus-ad/DMjxechlfqQ/">Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Item Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Revisiting-the-concept-of-defence-in-the-jus-ad/DMjxechlfqQ/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Revisiting-the-concept-of-defence-in-the-jus-ad/DMjxechlfqQ/">Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence, Johanna Friman</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
