Borrow it

The Resource Religious hatred and international law : the prohibition of incitement to violence or discrimination, by Jeroen Temperman

Religious hatred and international law : the prohibition of incitement to violence or discrimination, by Jeroen Temperman

Resource Information

The item Religious hatred and international law : the prohibition of incitement to violence or discrimination, by Jeroen Temperman represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library- University of Pennsylvania Law School.
This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.

Summary: "The UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights obliges state parties to prohibit any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination or violence. This book traces the origins of this provision and proposes an actus reus for this offence. The question of whether hateful incitement is a prohibition per se or also encapsulates a fundamental 'right to be protected against incitement' is extensively debated. Also addressed is the question of how to judge incitement. Is mens rea required to convict someone of advocating hatred, and if so, for what degree of intent? This analysis also includes the paramount question if and to what extent content and/or context factors ought to be decisive. The author extensively engages with comparative domestic law and compares the workings of the UN Human Rights Committee with those of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the European Court of Human Rights"--

Work

Label: Religious hatred and international law : the prohibition of incitement to violence or discrimination

Title remainder: the prohibition of incitement to violence or discrimination

Summary: "The UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights obliges state parties to prohibit any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination or violence. This book traces the origins of this provision and proposes an actus reus for this offence. The question of whether hateful incitement is a prohibition per se or also encapsulates a fundamental 'right to be protected against incitement' is extensively debated. Also addressed is the question of how to judge incitement. Is mens rea required to convict someone of advocating hatred, and if so, for what degree of intent? This analysis also includes the paramount question if and to what extent content and/or context factors ought to be decisive. The author extensively engages with comparative domestic law and compares the workings of the UN Human Rights Committee with those of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the European Court of Human Rights"--