The Resource Neutral science panels : two examples of panels of court-appointed experts in the breast implants product liability litigation, Laural L. Hooper, Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging

Neutral science panels : two examples of panels of court-appointed experts in the breast implants product liability litigation, Laural L. Hooper, Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging

Label
Neutral science panels : two examples of panels of court-appointed experts in the breast implants product liability litigation
Title
Neutral science panels
Title remainder
two examples of panels of court-appointed experts in the breast implants product liability litigation
Statement of responsibility
Laural L. Hooper, Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
Creator
Contributor
Subject
Language
eng
Member of
Action
digitized
Cataloging source
OCLCE
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Hooper, Laural L
Government publication
federal national government publication
Index
no index present
LC call number
KF8961
LC item number
.H66 2001
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • bibliography
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
  • Cecil, Joe S
  • Willging, Thomas E
  • Federal Judicial Center
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Court-appointed experts
  • Products liability
  • Court-appointed experts
  • Products liability
  • United States
Label
Neutral science panels : two examples of panels of court-appointed experts in the breast implants product liability litigation, Laural L. Hooper, Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
Instantiates
Publication
Antecedent source
file reproduced from original
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
black and white
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
1. Introduction -- 2. Summary of Oregon breast impant litigation (Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.) -- 3. Summary of multidistrict litigation (In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Product Liability Litigation, MDL-926) -- 4. Identification and selection of experts -- 5. Instructions to the expert panel -- 6. Collecting scientific information and producing the reports -- 7. Discovery and depositions of the experts -- 8. Cost of the panels of experts -- 9. Preliminary assessment of the work of neutral expert panels -- 10. Suggestions for use of panels of neutral experts -- Appendix. Conflict and bias screening questionnaire
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource (v, 104 pages)
Form of item
online
Level of compression
  • lossless
  • lossy
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • c
Note
LLMC Digital Library Collection
http://library.link/vocab/ext/overdrive/overdriveId
99-102
Reformatting quality
  • preservation
  • access
Reproduction note
Electronic reproduction.
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)604097510
System details
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.
Label
Neutral science panels : two examples of panels of court-appointed experts in the breast implants product liability litigation, Laural L. Hooper, Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
Publication
Antecedent source
file reproduced from original
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
black and white
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
1. Introduction -- 2. Summary of Oregon breast impant litigation (Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.) -- 3. Summary of multidistrict litigation (In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Product Liability Litigation, MDL-926) -- 4. Identification and selection of experts -- 5. Instructions to the expert panel -- 6. Collecting scientific information and producing the reports -- 7. Discovery and depositions of the experts -- 8. Cost of the panels of experts -- 9. Preliminary assessment of the work of neutral expert panels -- 10. Suggestions for use of panels of neutral experts -- Appendix. Conflict and bias screening questionnaire
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource (v, 104 pages)
Form of item
online
Level of compression
  • lossless
  • lossy
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • c
Note
LLMC Digital Library Collection
http://library.link/vocab/ext/overdrive/overdriveId
99-102
Reformatting quality
  • preservation
  • access
Reproduction note
Electronic reproduction.
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)604097510
System details
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.

Library Locations

    • Biddle Law LibraryBorrow it
      3400 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, US
      39.954941 -75.193362
Processing Feedback ...