The Resource Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral
Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral
Resource Information
The item Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
Resource Information
The item Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.
This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
- Summary
- One of the cornerstones of arbitration is the finality of arbitral awards. Saving rare exceptions, arbitral awards cannot be subject to challenges based on the arbitrator's errors of law. Furthermore, there is no hierarchy between arbitral tribunals and judicial courts, nor are arbitrators part of any judicial system. Thus, if arbitrators are not part of any hierarchical scheme and if there is no challenge or appeal available against their errors of law, how could one say that arbitrators have a duty to follow judicial precedents? Besides, when individuals agree to solve their disputes outside the judicial arena, should they expect a private arbitrator to abide by the same standards of a system they have just avoided? Is the choice for arbitration not a choice for an entirely different legal system, unbound by the so called judge-made law? This book attempts to answer those questions by presenting a comprehensive guide to the relation between judicial precedents and arbitration in the United States, the United Kingdom and in Brazil, as well as in international arbitration as a whole.--
- Language
- eng
- Extent
- xxiii, 180 pages
- Isbn
- 9780854902279
- Label
- Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice
- Title
- Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent?
- Title remainder
- a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice
- Statement of responsibility
- Guilherme Rizzo Amaral
- Subject
-
- Arbitration and award -- Great Britain
- Arbitration and award -- United States
- Arbitration and award -- United States
- Brazil
- Comparative law
- Comparative law
- Comparative law
- Dispute resolution (Law)
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Brazil
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Brazil
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Great Britain
- Arbitration and award
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- United States
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- United States
- Great Britain
- Stare decisis
- Stare decisis -- Brazil
- Stare decisis -- Great Britain
- Stare decisis -- Great Britain
- Stare decisis -- United States
- Stare decisis -- United States
- United States
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Great Britain
- Arbitration and award -- Brazil
- Arbitration and award -- Brazil
- Arbitration and award -- Great Britain
- Language
- eng
- Summary
- One of the cornerstones of arbitration is the finality of arbitral awards. Saving rare exceptions, arbitral awards cannot be subject to challenges based on the arbitrator's errors of law. Furthermore, there is no hierarchy between arbitral tribunals and judicial courts, nor are arbitrators part of any judicial system. Thus, if arbitrators are not part of any hierarchical scheme and if there is no challenge or appeal available against their errors of law, how could one say that arbitrators have a duty to follow judicial precedents? Besides, when individuals agree to solve their disputes outside the judicial arena, should they expect a private arbitrator to abide by the same standards of a system they have just avoided? Is the choice for arbitration not a choice for an entirely different legal system, unbound by the so called judge-made law? This book attempts to answer those questions by presenting a comprehensive guide to the relation between judicial precedents and arbitration in the United States, the United Kingdom and in Brazil, as well as in international arbitration as a whole.--
- Assigning source
- Provided by Publisher
- Cataloging source
- YDX
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
- Amaral, Guilherme Rizzo
- Index
- no index present
- Literary form
- non fiction
- Nature of contents
- bibliography
- http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
-
- Dispute resolution (Law)
- Dispute resolution (Law)
- Dispute resolution (Law)
- Stare decisis
- Stare decisis
- Stare decisis
- Arbitration and award
- Arbitration and award
- Arbitration and award
- Comparative law
- Arbitration and award
- Comparative law
- Dispute resolution (Law)
- Stare decisis
- Brazil
- Great Britain
- United States
- Label
- Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 164-180)
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Dimensions
- 24 cm
- Extent
- xxiii, 180 pages
- Isbn
- 9780854902279
- Lccn
- 2017433352
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- System control number
- (OCoLC)996433473
- Label
- Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 164-180)
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Dimensions
- 24 cm
- Extent
- xxiii, 180 pages
- Isbn
- 9780854902279
- Lccn
- 2017433352
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- System control number
- (OCoLC)996433473
Subject
- Arbitration and award -- Great Britain
- Arbitration and award -- United States
- Arbitration and award -- United States
- Brazil
- Comparative law
- Comparative law
- Comparative law
- Dispute resolution (Law)
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Brazil
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Brazil
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Great Britain
- Arbitration and award
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- United States
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- United States
- Great Britain
- Stare decisis
- Stare decisis -- Brazil
- Stare decisis -- Great Britain
- Stare decisis -- Great Britain
- Stare decisis -- United States
- Stare decisis -- United States
- United States
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Great Britain
- Arbitration and award -- Brazil
- Arbitration and award -- Brazil
- Arbitration and award -- Great Britain
Library Links
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Judicial-precedent-and-arbitration--are/im4Pdn8OGYE/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Judicial-precedent-and-arbitration--are/im4Pdn8OGYE/">Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Item Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Judicial-precedent-and-arbitration--are/im4Pdn8OGYE/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Judicial-precedent-and-arbitration--are/im4Pdn8OGYE/">Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice, Guilherme Rizzo Amaral</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
