The Resource Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University
Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University
Resource Information
The item Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
Resource Information
The item Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School.
This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
- Summary
- "The Guardians of Judicial Independence The U.S. Supreme Court rules on some of the most important issues in American politics. Naturally, these decisions strike a nerve with many Americans. In the wake of the 2015 landmark ruling Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution guarantees a right to marry for same-sex couples, Republican Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana argued that "The Supreme Court is completely out of control, making laws on their own ... . If we want to save some money, let's just get rid of the Court."1 Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) stated that the "American people, through the democratic process, should be able to determine the meaning of this bedrock institution [marriage] in our society."2 And Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, nearly the 2016 Republican nominee for president, proposed constitutional amendments to overturn federal court rulings legalizing gay marriage and to strip the federal courts of their ability to hear same-sex marriage cases.3"--
- Language
- eng
- Extent
- xiii, 306 pages
- Contents
-
- The Guardians of Judicial Independence
- Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing
- A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support
- General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing
- Specific Policy Disagreement and Support for Court-Curbing
- Partisan Polarization and Support for Court-Curbing
- Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning
- Reconsidering the Public Foundations of Judicial Independence
- Isbn
- 9781107188419
- Label
- Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence
- Title
- Curbing the court
- Title remainder
- why the public constrains judicial independence
- Statement of responsibility
- Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University
- Language
- eng
- Summary
- "The Guardians of Judicial Independence The U.S. Supreme Court rules on some of the most important issues in American politics. Naturally, these decisions strike a nerve with many Americans. In the wake of the 2015 landmark ruling Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution guarantees a right to marry for same-sex couples, Republican Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana argued that "The Supreme Court is completely out of control, making laws on their own ... . If we want to save some money, let's just get rid of the Court."1 Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) stated that the "American people, through the democratic process, should be able to determine the meaning of this bedrock institution [marriage] in our society."2 And Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, nearly the 2016 Republican nominee for president, proposed constitutional amendments to overturn federal court rulings legalizing gay marriage and to strip the federal courts of their ability to hear same-sex marriage cases.3"--
- Assigning source
- Provided by publisher
- Cataloging source
- DLC
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorDate
- 1975-
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
- Bartels, Brandon L.
- Illustrations
- illustrations
- Index
- index present
- Literary form
- non fiction
- Nature of contents
- bibliography
- http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
- Johnston, Christopher D.
- http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
-
- Political questions and judicial power
- Judicial independence
- Justice, Administration of
- Judicial independence
- Justice, Administration of
- Political questions and judicial power
- United States
- Label
- Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references and index
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Contents
- The Guardians of Judicial Independence -- Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing -- A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support -- General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing -- Specific Policy Disagreement and Support for Court-Curbing -- Partisan Polarization and Support for Court-Curbing -- Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning -- Reconsidering the Public Foundations of Judicial Independence
- Dimensions
- 24 cm
- Extent
- xiii, 306 pages
- Isbn
- 9781107188419
- Lccn
- 2019058311
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- Note
- GOBI Library Solutions from EBSCO
- Other physical details
- illustrations (black and white)
- System control number
- (OCoLC)1134461563
- Label
- Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references and index
- Carrier category
- volume
- Carrier category code
-
- nc
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Contents
- The Guardians of Judicial Independence -- Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing -- A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support -- General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing -- Specific Policy Disagreement and Support for Court-Curbing -- Partisan Polarization and Support for Court-Curbing -- Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning -- Reconsidering the Public Foundations of Judicial Independence
- Dimensions
- 24 cm
- Extent
- xiii, 306 pages
- Isbn
- 9781107188419
- Lccn
- 2019058311
- Media category
- unmediated
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- n
- Note
- GOBI Library Solutions from EBSCO
- Other physical details
- illustrations (black and white)
- System control number
- (OCoLC)1134461563
Library Links
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Curbing-the-court--why-the-public-constrains/EFhBPYASEUU/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Curbing-the-court--why-the-public-constrains/EFhBPYASEUU/">Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Item Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Curbing-the-court--why-the-public-constrains/EFhBPYASEUU/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/portal/Curbing-the-court--why-the-public-constrains/EFhBPYASEUU/">Curbing the court : why the public constrains judicial independence, Brandon L. Bartels, George Washington University; Christopher D. Johnston, Duke University</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.law.upenn.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.law.upenn.edu/">Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School</a></span></span></span></span></div>
